Marsland is like for like, as for Richards, I agree with you.
I remember a thread somewhere about the Richards chassis being accepted for series LRs for sure as the early series were of the same construction, but not 100% on later models?
Marsland is like for like, as for Richards, I agree with you.
Marsland is like for like, as for Richards, I agree with you.
It's like for like on a td5 then but can't you request they fit a suitable crossmember or is that Richards?No, they arnt, they use a TD5 rear cross member so technically they are not like for like. Also internal baffles, does the original have internal baffles or what ever it is they spot weld in there? I know this is splitting hairs and I would have no problem fitting one but if VOSA decided to , they could.
It's been 25 years from when I last sent a motor for inspection.
This is done on a points scale.
Chassis
Axles
Gear box
Engine
Body work
All these have different values. You have to list these to and get above a score to keep your reg/age of build.
A file of receipts for a build helps so do photos.
This was a series 2 where I converted the existing chassis to take coils. Yes I left the spring hangers on incase I had problems in the future of the age of the chassis.
Just about retained ref/aged plate.
And yes it had an engineers report.
@nobber how long have you had the motor for and have you always had this mot/taxed?
That's why I would check dimensions before accepting one in future.I wouldn't buy a Richards chassis, heard to many bad things about them, the whole 2.5mm selling point thing? .5 mm thicker isn't really anything. I am sure they are fine but they seem to be a bit of a gamble.
Only problem I would think will be insurance,they don't like modified,my mate and me cut down a disco 1 and fitted a h/ c tub from a 110.All the mount mates perfect and we over engineered everything but because the fuel filler didn't line up perfect they wouldn't pass it till we had a new tube made.No Biggie to do but bit nit nicking we thought.Nfu did cover it in the end and was only a few quid over normal priceOk, boring bit, how legal is this? It will come under radically altered rather than rebuilt, I wont have a manufacture reciept, it wont be OEM or a genuine replacement part, can I get away with this?
Adding different outriggers has always been cause for concern. As in building 100" defenders.Have a look on this website , if you go onto a product it shows the jigs they're using to weld them up .
https://www.shielderchassis.com/product/defender-110-200-tdi/
I agree with Bobsticle, I think when the say " alter the chassis " I think it means drastically alter it , like make it wider add extra axles and I would imagine that by now all the people that are making chassis and part chassis would have had a warning on there web site stating that you need to inform the DVLA and have it checked .