mine are exactly the same as that on my 90 mate, should be good to go.
Forgot to mention, if that's a Marsland chassis and you're lifting the suspension 2" it might be worth fitting dislocation cones on the front too, my HD +2" springs were always ending up unseated so I had to fit cones, my mates 90 is on a Richards chassis and his reseat OK so he got away without the cones
they are sided so the shock runs centrally through the spring
Oh, ok.
So do I need to get some different ones?
I did wonder why they looked the same.
I wonder if Paddocks would take them back?
I have emailed Paddocks to ask whether they are sided, though not sure they reply to emails...
They are on mine - gwynlewis..
Land Rover Challenge Front Turrets +2 inch gwynlewis4x4 suspension turrets 8274 | eBay
2These turrets are for our challenge suspension kit and to be used when fitting our + 5.5 inch, 11 inch travel dampers.
Fits:- Front Defender 90/110/130, Disco 1 & RRC.
They have a built in spring re locator to guide the spring back in if it dislocates, its the same as fitting dislocation cones but it is built all in one to cut the cost of 2 items.
These turrets are handed, the hole in the upper leg must be fitted towards to the front of the vehicle and the longer part of the relocator must go against the chassis"
If you need any further assurance despite having it in writing from the supplier all you need to know is that the original enclosed turrets are not sided and then you know it's technically possible to design a tubular one that is also not sided.
So.....are the original enclosed turrets sided?
Perhaps there are designs out there that accommodate a greater range of articulation and then perhaps it is necessary to design in some asymmetry.
I don't know