If you were wearing said tabbard and a Pink helmet cover , and pink jodphurs , riding a small pony then police would be on a bit of a sticky wicket trying to prove "impersonating police" and cps would probably not run with it , more likely they would try and coerce you into complying with their wishes . However if you had black helmet with chequered band and black jodphurs with knee boots and riding a large hunter then it might be a bit different especially if you were trying to signal to traffic . What they want to get people to think they can enforce and what powers they actually have can be quite divergant at times !

For a start the guy who wrote the letter needs to reread S90 TPA 1996 as the first thing that needs to be proven is intent to decieve, also the police uniform part is not a simple as it first appears either
 
Last edited:
So its approved but its condemend by he old bill?

Not really, there was an advertising standards case against equisafety and the "approval" or so I have read.

31 December, 2011

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has upheld a complaint against an advert by Equisafety that said its Polite range of high-visibility riding wear had been “police consulted”.

Equisafety told the ASA that the words “police consulted” were not meant to imply that the police had approved the product for use.


However, the company agreed to take the wording off future adverts.



If you were wearing said tabbard and a Pink helmet cover , and pink jodphurs , riding a small pony then police would be on a bit of a sticky wicket trying to prove "impersonating police" and cps would probably not run with it , more likely they would try and coerce you into complying with their wishes . However if you had black helmet with chequered band and black jodphurs with knee boots and riding a large hunter then it might be a bit different especially if you were trying to signal to traffic . What they want to get people to think they can enforce and what powers they actually have can be quite divergant at times !

For a start the guy who wrote the letter needs to reread S90 TPA 1996 as the first thing that needs to be proven is intent to decieve, also the police uniform part is not a simple as it first appears either


Seem to have worried some companies, this one has withdrawn the chequered range and they dont even make the "polite" ones (I dont think anyway)
High visibility product rider, horse, pet - v-bandz.co.uk
 
Last edited:
I'm all in favour of it. Anything that makes the arseholes slow down when you're riding a horse along the lanes is OK by me. Lots of horse riders wear them around here and I haven't heard of anyone being told they can't.
 
Both my parents wear them. No problem with them.

Although it would be funny if my mother was to be arrested for it :lol:
 
seeing as the POLITE gear is not legal........... and walkers/hikers along with horse people are using this Maybe people need to file a complaint for impersonating the police and get a few banged for it
 
When a young idiot comes flying round a bend in his hot hatch down a country lane and sees the hi vis and chequer pattern with POLITE in nice big letters across the back, the first thing he does is take his foot off the throttle and go for the brake. Brilliant! Far better than smashing into the back of a horse and injuring it to the extent it has to be shot, to say nothing of maiming or killing the rider. So what if he thinks he's seen a copper? I'd impersonate the Queen if it made me safer :D
 

Similar threads