Nodge68
Well-Known Member
The MOTs look like it's been run on a budget. The rear pads failed on one MOT, but all the rotors were listed as advisories on fail and retest. It's real sign of lack of funds for proper maintenance by putting new pads in a worn or pitted rotor. If a rotor comes up as an advisory, then it should be replaced along with new pads.
Another MOT listed upper arms as advisories, then it failed on the same thing the next year, so those were also ignored.
There are also several tyres failing the MOT, another sign of questionable owner finances.
These are seriously expensive vehicles to own, especially so if you have to rely on garages to carry out any maintenance.
Oh and the oil pump issue was fixed after 2007, as the early pumps casing cracked on the timing belt boss.
Unless it's insanity cheap, or comes with a watertight long warranty, I'd be looking elsewhere.
Another MOT listed upper arms as advisories, then it failed on the same thing the next year, so those were also ignored.
There are also several tyres failing the MOT, another sign of questionable owner finances.
These are seriously expensive vehicles to own, especially so if you have to rely on garages to carry out any maintenance.
Oh and the oil pump issue was fixed after 2007, as the early pumps casing cracked on the timing belt boss.
Unless it's insanity cheap, or comes with a watertight long warranty, I'd be looking elsewhere.