So
How come the 4.6 gets better mpg than the efi 3.5 giving the fact that they both run 14.7
Seems strange
Now i run afr wb on all my motors.. The stock 4.6 on gems was lean too lean on cruise
Not to bad on wot and lean on idle..ecu and lamdas were good etc
So why these readings?? Cos thats what lr set them at to get decent mpg??
Also talking in depth to various tuners .no nameszbut NOT RPI
But people who know their stuff and work for lr ovetfinch etc reason for talking to them iwas making gearbox ecu for zf 24 hpeh and needed info
Now conversation went to linersAND YES YOU ARE CORRECT in that block is too thin
But the fact that engine runs too hot ( internally) REALLY dont help..
Hense in running better afr and cooling can make issue dissappear..
However i suggest only real curecis top hat liners,one dont havecto buy from rpi!!
Or prehaps as a bodge liner bolts
So please dont slag me off for my input as aint guessing here but done my homework..
Also i agree its a shame lr didnt get funding, if only ..
Sally my 1971 rrc runs supercharged lpg toyota quad can v8
Ruby runs supercharged nitrosed lpg rv8 4.6
Sally is sooooooo much more refined!!guess which i take to europe??lol
Guess which i take to europe??lol
Back to figures..prehaps notvall rv8's arevthevsame
SORRY FOR SPELLING AND GRAMMER using my bloody phone as interpoohbdown
I hate phone but reallyvrecomend otter iphone cases!!as using same phone i just threw as hard as i could against wall,bouncing off telly standcand fire place cos it ate all above!!
Phone still wirks!!or works even
Simon
The simple answer to the better fuel consumption is that the 3.5 engines ALL run a basic closed loop bank fired system - with NO input on the ignition system.Gems and Thor both run from a far more accurate ignition system without a crap distributor,making good use of knock sensors to run as much advance as possible,backing off individual pots if needed.They also inject sequentially.And are adaptive,learning the individual engine,the 14CUX has limited adjustment to please the oxy sensors.
All these little improvements add up to the goal of controlling the conditions in each combustion chamber for every firing event.So more efficient...In the ideal world for this you would have a set of sensors for each cylinder - in practice this is not very practical,nor cheap.
If your Gems unit ran lean at cruise there was something wrong with it.There is very little you can do either side of the rich/lean signal from a narrow band sensor when running closed loop.The major changes in the fuel map are where the software chooses to come out of closed loop - ie, under WOT conditions/heavy load.
Engine temps are controlled by the thermostat - and its position,coolant flow,rad and hose layout/design,etc,etc.That the 94mm bore R V8's cant cope with a higher running temp just shows its a crap engine with little margin of strength.The 3.5 would have just put up with it,often with a poorly maintained cooling system too.
I've had a 3.5 2 door RRC in with oil boiling in its sump it was so hot.There was no coolant in it - at all.We thought it was toast,not so,the following day it was refilled with coolant and had an oil change.Has done a lot of work since with no apparent ill effects.
Show me a 94mm engine that would cope with that....