On or around Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:23:42 +0100, Ian Rawlings
<news06@tarcus.org.uk> enlightened us thusly:
>On 2006-10-25, Andy <andrew.cooke4@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you would be very surprised, the only thing it would lose on is
>> breakover and departure angles.
>
>For a super-expensive truck, I wouldn't take it off-road with
>disadvantages like that. I've seen the Disco II in road trim get
>stuck in stupid places because of the trim around the edges, the
>wheelbase and then once it's stuck, the lack of proper recovery
>points. Another issue with the D3 is the weight.
One thing they should consider is quick-release trim and spoilers and so on
around the bottom of the body - this has been a bugbear for a lot longer
than the D3 - sometime part-way through the RR classic run they started
fitting front spoilers, which people knocked off on the scenery off-road. If
these panels were easy to remove (and any low side panels, too) then they
could be taken off when you went off-roading and replaced afterwards. I'm
sure it's not beyond the ability of the designers and manufacturers to make
such things.
--
Austin Shackles.
www.ddol-las.net my opinions are just that
0123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123456789712345
1 weebl: What's this? | in recognition of the fun that is weebl and bob
2 bob: it a SigRuler! | check out the weebl and bob archive:
3 weebl: How Handy! |
http://www.weebl.jolt.co.uk/archives.php