William D. Fillingham

William D. Fillingham

Member
I have just bought a new swivel ball part number FTC5366 which supercedes the original FRC7065, but the problem is that the surface that the sleeve 571822 runs on is not machined the same, and hence the sleeve sits 2mm further outwards. (I measured..).. this means that the CV joint also sits 2mm further out, which thus in turn means that when stub axle is bolted on its so tight that the whole swivel joint is locked solid... (ie the stub is hard up against the CV joint, which in turn is pushing the sleeve onto the inner surface of the swivel ball.

There seems no other options or alternative part numbers for the sleeve or the spacer.

Any ideas?

note that the swivel FTC5366 I bought was OEM from Rimmer Bros.

This is the correct part numebrs they specify for the non-ABS Disco1 and that it supercedes FRC7065.
 
This is the original with machined surface. (part number FRC7065 that was purchased about 12 years ago.)
IMG_7165.JPG
 
Another evidence that "OEM" is far from being like genuine...it's just another replacement which was made by the same manufacturer as the genuine but not at the same standards
 
neilly said:
Hopefully @jamesmartin may see this and comment.

Cheers
Click to expand...
sierrafery said:
Another evidence that "OEM" is far from being like genuine...it's just another replacement which was made by the same manufacturer as the genuine but not at the same standards
Click to expand...

Well I have emailed Rimmer Bros so either they will have to take it back, and I will buy a genuine one. It's the last part actually on a complete rebuild I am doing. Many other parts I did buy genuine (event the new front springs), the swivel ball was one of the very few "OEM" parts actually bought...
 
I observed that if it's not to be genuine a bearmach replacement can be better than the so called OEM ones
 
Incidentally the 12 year old one I removed (FRC7065) was I think a Bearmach one. It was only due to slight pitting at the top that i decided to replace it. Luckily I kept the bearings in place with cable ties, and not chucked it in the scrap pile, so it looks like we may end up having to refit it...
 
sierrafery said:
Another evidence that "OEM" is far from being like genuine...it's just another replacement which was made by the same manufacturer as the genuine but not at the same standards
Click to expand...
its not really,ftc5366 wouldnt need a machined surface for the support bush, neither would any frc7065 after 92, its more accurate to say ft5366 is only a replacement for later frc7065s
 
just that you can't buy FRC7065 anymore cos all the suppliers are sending you to FTC5366 as being the right one which supersedes the other... something similar happened some time ago to a friend of mine who has a RRC
 
That FRC7065 is just a superseded part number the part is the same, it seems they have some left from the old stock :cool:
 
mine is very early... in fact I think it's one of the very early four doors........ and has the old style brake pad retainers and split pins etc like a 1980's Rangerover.
 
An update to this thread.
I’ve encountered the exact same issue with new parts not having the machined landing surface for the bronze sleeve on the shaft.
My solution has been to give it to friendly machinists - who for £80 will machine the surface in two of said swivel balls. If you’re in the Bristol area, they are “D&S Machining” of Yate area.
Hope that helps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Disco 2 driver side track rod ball joint part number and replacement
Replies
16
Views
2K
frostythor
frostythor
L
Disco 3 (LR3) I return to the fold with a Window Fault
Replies
6
Views
558
johnlad
johnlad
Flossie
P38A Sunroof- found where the leaks are but is there a part number.
2
Replies
25
Views
2K
brianp38dse
brianp38dse
Resurgam
Bizarre swivel/halfshaft problem
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Mr. Kairo
Mr. Kairo
Vogueman
L322 Something doesn't seem right
2 3
Replies
52
Views
5K
myfirstl322
M