johndregg

Active Member
5473501ec17d240545bc4a1aa1574549.jpg

Could someone identify the coolant connections left to right in the pic for me?
My SU manifold has a different array of pipe work and I'm trying to work out what mods I might need to do to plumb this one in.
 
I currently have a small diameter pipe from the top of the radiator to the inlet manifold, could I use that as the return from the throttle body heater?
 
I should explain that I'm not using this in a normal way. I'm building an lpg only manifold using a BLOS carb as a bit of an experiment.
Would it do any harm to run the return from the throttle heater into the top of the rad?
 
My current plumbing from the water pump runs to the heater through a pipe under the inlet manifold, then back into the manifold at the back.
This manifold doesn't have a return from the heater at the back. Where can I run the return from the heater to?
I'm still at the planning stage of this job so thanks for your patience.
 
6c7c67fbd38a3d24569e328f37632b1e.jpg

This pipe at the back of the water pump, is it send or return?
If it's return, could I plumb the heater like this: front of manifold->lpg reducer->heater->back to water pump?
 
6c7c67fbd38a3d24569e328f37632b1e.jpg

This pipe at the back of the water pump, is it send or return?
If it's return, could I plumb the heater like this: front of manifold->lpg reducer->heater->back to water pump?

Yes and yes I think so.

Not sure about throttle heater. Mine is removed and no problem, though I'm not starting up on gas
 
Last edited:
Any idea if the temp sender in the efi manifold will work the same as the carb one? I mean, do I need to retro fit the one from the SU manifold by using an adaptor or cutting a new thread?
 
Last edited:
I've been doing a thread search on this site and on google to find an answer for the temp sender issue. Quite a few people have asked the same question but they haven't posted their solution to the problem.
I guess fitting the SU type sender to the efi manifold will work best. Or is there a compatible sender that won't need a new thread cutting?
I cleaned the manifold up a bit.
6c2cca0fc5253876caebdca30b43d8f9.jpg
 
There are different manifolds. This one is 22mm (3/4"?) pipe to the left of thermostat to the matrix, then from the matrix back to water pump. I'm planning to run my return pipe under the manifold.
 
There are different manifolds. This one is 22mm (3/4"?) pipe to the left of thermostat to the matrix, then from the matrix back to water pump. I'm planning to run my return pipe under the manifold.

Sorry, I described hotwire efi type.
 
Sorted the temp sender issue. Drilled and tapped the EFI hole to accept the sender from a carb defender model.
fb594168f944cdd52c023104aaff0979.jpg
 
Hi John, how are you getting on with this? You've seen the picture of my 3.9 EFI, BLOS set-up. is it clear enough what is routed where?

For me it was a case of make it up as I went along to get everything to fit. It's a bit tight in a series engine bay so I put the EFI Plenum cover on back to front for extra clearance. Therefore, my throttle cable, and water pipe system are completely custom.
 
I'm about ready to do the job. Got all the parts, modded the efi manifold to accept the standard 110 temp sender, RRC efi throttle cable fits both ends.
I'm just debating wether to plumb the vaporiser in before the heater or to keep it parallel as it is now. Cut down on warm up time in the morning.
Should have time to do it at the weekend.
 
I plumbed everything in series in the end, runs as follows: Water pump, vaporiser, heater, engine.

Much better warm up times, and the heater is a lot hotter.
 

Similar threads