Billybones
Active Member
Hi can anyone tell me what percentage is a 265/75-16 tyre taller than a 255/70-16 tyre please.
Thank you Bill.
Thank you Bill.
Hi can anyone tell me what percentage is a 265/75-16 tyre taller than a 255/70-16 tyre please.
Thank you Bill.
Ahh, but that's not what you originally askedThank you for all your reply's and hard work .
The reason for the question is that i am changing tyre size from the 255s to the 265s and i know this will put my speedo and odometer out, another member on this site has said that if i go bigger than a certain % i could have other problems so i wanted to know by what % i was going taller, also it will help by giving me an idea of how far out my speedo will be.
Hope this makes sense ??.
Bill
Ahh, but that's not what you originally asked
I guessed it was something to do with wheel arch clearance. As usual, @neilly was thinking along the right lines
As far as I know your speedo will be affected by the diameter of your wheel and tyre combo as this affects the circumference and so the number of revolutions the wheels do over a certain distance and time.
So, the % increase in overall diameter.
View attachment 252346
To calculate the circumference we multiply both circumferences by the constant π (Pi) Multiplying everything by the same constant increases everything in the same proportion and so should work out the same.
So, comparing circumferences.
View attachment 252347
To double check.
View attachment 252348
However, I wouldn't be bothering with all of that b@ll@cks. I would use a sat nav to check your speedo. They're very accurate.
You might need to adjust your steering lock stop bolts as the bigger tyres may well hit your radius arms as you approach full lock.
Ahh, of course! Forgot about that. What a dunderheedYour maths is a little out there matey.
the 70 is the % of the width. It is still a tad over 5 %.
@Billybones
Your speedo will measure 5% under.
Cheers
So isn't the difference in profiles 199 - 179 = 20mm.I see where the discrepancy is now. '70' in 255/70-16 isn't 70mm, it is the aspect ratio i.e. the height of the sidewall as a percentage of the tyre width - 70%. For the original tyre that would be 255 x 70 / 100 = 179mm. For the new tyre it is 265 x 75 / 100 = 199mm. Substitute these figures into your calculations and we get the same results.
Simplest way, take a piece of chalk, mark the tyre and the floor where both touch it, then roll it forward until the chalkmark on the tyre touches the floor again. continue the mark onto the floor. The distance between the two is the rolling circumference. BUT, if you are going fast enough the tyre may well swell a tiny bit with the heat and the circumference may change as centripetal force throws it out a bit too.The depth of the sidewall is 11% greater and the difference in the diameter is 40mm as you say, but to calculate the percentage increase in the rolling diameter (or circumference), which is what will impact the speedometer, you need to include the 16" / 406mm wheel. The difference then becomes 804mm vs 763mm. 804 / 763 = 1.053 i.e. 5.3% bigger.
You haven't been around long enough to know this. I have, so it's all my fault @neilly is always right.The depth of the sidewall is 11% greater and the difference in the diameter is 40mm as you say, but to calculate the percentage increase in the rolling diameter (or circumference), which is what will impact the speedometer, you need to include the 16" / 406mm wheel. The difference then becomes 804mm vs 763mm. 804 / 763 = 1.053 i.e. 5.3% bigger.
You haven't been around long enough to know this. I have, so it's all my fault @neilly is always right.
However, we can console ourselves by remembering that 'nobody likes a smart @rse'.
I thought he was calling me a smart @rse, not you, on the basis you are a long serving member of the Forum and have earned the right to correct him, whereas I'm just a newbie.I never said @Keith_L was wrong, in fact I thought his response was quite correct , post #6.
So I was not a smart @rse with his response, just said yours was slightly wrong. Sorry of you thought that was being a smart @arse, However....