All old vehicles are slightly rubbish, however that's not the reason we like them......ok it a little bit of the reason......ok it the main reason
 
Plenty of modern crap still with leaf springs on the rear axle.

Series of all models are pretty crap, 90/110/defenders also crap, though people seem to get really upset when you say that, so it is always worth a mention every now and then!
 
Depends on your definition.

In terms of safety, economy, ergonomics. Yes, crap.

In terms of long term ownership, resilience, dependability, avoidance of fragile electronics, and simplicity they are excellent.

And coil springs aren't as good as leaf springs. Simple, reliable, strong, backed by over a thousand years of design and testing.

No panhard rods, a frames, arms or other bollox to keep the axle in the right place....
 
Plenty of modern crap still with leaf springs on the rear axle.

Series of all models are pretty crap, 90/110/defenders also crap, though people seem to get really upset when you say that, so it is always worth a mention every now and then!
They might be crap but not as crap as the new ones.
 
Depends on your definition.

In terms of safety, economy, ergonomics. Yes, crap.

In terms of long term ownership, resilience, dependability, avoidance of fragile electronics, and simplicity they are excellent.

And coil springs aren't as good as leaf springs. Simple, reliable, strong, backed by over a thousand years of design and testing.

No panhard rods, a frames, arms or other bollox to keep the axle in the right place....
Air suspension all day, dead reliable, how often do you hear of d2/d3/4/rr with suspension problems, thats right never!
 
Hmmm. They might be slow, noisy, etc etc but my series have saved my arse and my families over the years, series got the wife to hospital while having sprog 1 in thick snow when my new merc amg died, got us through flash floods in Spain and England, took a very ill person to hospital through snow and ice when ambo couldn’t get through ….for those reasons alone I love em.
 
I agree with most, but not all, the comments already made about Series LR of which I have owned 5 over the decades.
By far their worst fault is that 90-odd percent of them are rot-boxes.

The Wilks Bros. may well have copied the American Jeep when designing the first LR, but one thing they didn't copy was the chassis.
LR chassis only a few years old (even those much younger than Series) rot from the inside out, 80 year-old Jeeps ones generally don't. If you can select a decent Series ie with a good chassis (pref. a galvanised replacement) & bulkhead from all the dross out there you've found gold as all the mechanical bits can be replaced &/or modified.

Cue the most mis-informed bar-room quote of all time 'LR's are made of aluminium so (they) don't rust' :rolleyes:
 
The Wilks Bros had the pre production run chassis galvanised. Rover dropped it on cost grounds and the thought that the "Land Rover" would only be a gap filler until other post war car design's came along.
The Prototype Land rover was based on the Jeep U channel chassis but its flexibility resulted in the alloy body panels cracking so a box was adopted.
Watching
SAM_0518.JPG
an original Jeep tackling rough country and one can see the flex and how it helps keep wheels on the ground.
Not far from me is an old Austin Ten that once belonged to my grandfather, unrestored but cared for and still on the road after ninety years. U frame chassis still good.
 

Similar threads