N

nevillef

Guest

• Feb 3, 2005

• #1

Not required to work for MOT. Rear wiper never worked on my Toyota Camry-
however it did fail the entire MOT for a small split in the front ones....

Nevillef

"Mr.Nice." <markvarleyphoto@*nospam*softhome.net> wrote in message
news:c6l401tds3rag7srss5holepph863faucq@4ax.com...
> Rear wiper, if fitted does it have to work for the MOT?
>
>
> Regards.
> Mark.(AKA, Mr.Nice.)
> --
> _________________________________________
> www.markvarleyphoto.co.uk
> 1984 110 CSW 2.5(na)D
> (3,000 rivets flying in close formation)
> _________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ................................................................
> Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
> >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
> -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
>

 

R

Richard

Guest

• Feb 3, 2005

• #2

I thought if it was there it should work?
Richard


"nevillef" <F_CK@FF_SPAMMERS.COM> wrote in message
news:MFvMd.603$Co6.510@newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
> Not required to work for MOT. Rear wiper never worked on my Toyota Camry-
> however it did fail the entire MOT for a small split in the front ones....
>
> Nevillef
>
> "Mr.Nice." <markvarleyphoto@*nospam*softhome.net> wrote in message
> news:c6l401tds3rag7srss5holepph863faucq@4ax.com...
>> Rear wiper, if fitted does it have to work for the MOT?
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>> Mark.(AKA, Mr.Nice.)
>> --
>> _________________________________________
>> www.markvarleyphoto.co.uk
>> 1984 110 CSW 2.5(na)D
>> (3,000 rivets flying in close formation)
>> _________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ................................................................
>> Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>> >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
>> -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
>>
>
>

 

C

Colonel Tupperware

Guest

• Feb 3, 2005

• #3

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:21:52 GMT, "Richard" <richardsemail
NO.SPAM@AT.NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

>I thought if it was there it should work?
>Richard
>
Only for some items, not including rear wipers.

--
ColonelTupperware,
spouting bollocks on Usenet since 1997
Usenet FAQ at
http://www.its.caltech.edu/its/services/internetapps/news/news2.shtml
UPCE FAQ at http://upce.org.uk/ UKRM FAQ at http://www.ukrm.net/faq/

 

D

Dougal

Guest

• Feb 3, 2005

• #4

>>I thought if it was there it should work?
>>Richard
>>
>
> Only for some items, not including rear wipers.

.... after all one does not have to have a rear wiper in the first place.
All the other items that need to work are mandatory fitments.

There may be one exception, I think, in that if there is a
non-obligatory rear fog light i.e. two fitted where the law requires
only one, then the non-obligatory one needs to work, too.

 

A

Andy.Smalley

Guest

• Feb 4, 2005

• #5

"Dougal" <DougalAThiskennel.free-online.co.uk> wrote in message news:9ZudnYme1YaxLZ_fRVnyig@eclipse.net.uk...
>>>I thought if it was there it should work?
>>>Richard
>>>
>>
>> Only for some items, not including rear wipers.
>
> ... after all one does not have to have a rear wiper in the first place. All the other items that need to
> work are mandatory fitments.
>
> There may be one exception, I think, in that if there is a non-obligatory rear fog light i.e. two fitted
> where the law requires only one, then the non-obligatory one needs to work, too.
>

rear wipers not testable
rear fog lamps only the one that is required to be fitted
either in the centre or on the off side is tested
not the nearside one

--
Andy

SWB Series 2a ( dressed as a 3) "Bruce"
It's big, it's mean it's really, really green