Hi what sort of mpg are you guys getting with the FL2 SD4 ???
Auto will be low 30s, manual will be high 30s.
Our Kuga manual does high 30s to low 40s. It's a similar weight and power to the FL2, so is pretty representative.
 
Last edited:
Depends what you mean by around town. Constant stopping in traffic and averaging 15-20mph with max 30mph before stopping again within half a mile?
 
Depends what you mean by around town. Constant stopping in traffic and averaging 15-20mph with max 30mph before stopping again within half a mile?
By round town i mean just travelling around on local B roads not neccesarily stop start just local every day driving
 
By round town i mean just travelling around on local B roads not neccesarily stop start just local every day driving
ok. I'm going for 34mpg then
At constant 50mph on the dash with cruise on yer can get 51mpg if the road is flat, in roadworks for 15 miles ont M6
 
would it make any difference weather it was auto or manual if you was travelling at a steady 50mph ?

Yes. An auto box is always going to draw more power from the engine, than a manual box. How much will depend on road conditions, speed and throttle position. At a steady 50 Mph the auto will be good, but will using a bit more fuel than a manual.
 
Yes. An auto box is always going to draw more power from the engine, than a manual box. How much will depend on road conditions, speed and throttle position. At a steady 50 Mph the auto will be good, but will using a bit more fuel than a manual.
thanks i never knew that i allways thought the auto just used more fuel just getting up to speed i never realised it still used more once you was up to speed
 
Thos figures are not exactly inspiring. I get in my '98 FL1 Series 1.8 30 to 33mpg routinely. Auto Vs manual: I recall from my Rover car club days that the later SDI V8s of the mid 1980s the manual gave better economy around town but the autos did better on open road cruising. That came from an Australian motoring mag IIRC. Modern auto in the CVT guise give impressive economy but those gearboxes are diabolical if they fail - and they do = £££ / $$$
 
Thos figures are not exactly inspiring. I get in my '98 FL1 Series 1.8 30 to 33mpg routinely. Auto Vs manual: I recall from my Rover car club days that the later SDI V8s of the mid 1980s the manual gave better economy around town but the autos did better on open road cruising. That came from an Australian motoring mag IIRC. Modern auto in the CVT guise give impressive economy but those gearboxes are diabolical if they fail - and they do = £££ / $$$
My 2003 1.8 petrol does between 30 to 35mpg. I wish it was auto, I'd happily sacrifice 10% fuel economy to get rid of the awful clutch and gearbox

Col
 
My 2003 1.8 petrol does between 30 to 35mpg. I wish it was auto, I'd happily sacrifice 10% fuel economy to get rid of the awful clutch and gearbox

Col

That's why I have an auto. The only FL1 that I think would be good with a manual box is the V6. Simple because the V6s torque curve would suit a manual better than the auto box it comes with.
 
The difference in mpg between the TD4 auto and SD4 (auto only) isn't much if any. Some owners eggspect more but what LR effectively did was take the TD4 engine and fit a bigger turbo to create more power. This provided an alternative diesel engine option with diesel economy with the same acceleration as the i6 petrol 6 cylinder, but not the poor fool economy of the i6. If I remembers correctly they took the i6 off sale in 2008 in the UK. The i6 wasn't that popular in the UK. Probably due to the TD4 being so good, reasonably fast and the fact fool is considered eggspensive in the UK. LR needed a higher output power as an option to help fight the battle of new car sales with rivals who also had higher power options. Another important thing is they kept the 185gm/km CO2 the same on the SD4 as per the TD4 auto. This is helpful for everyone on road tax as well as company car buyers as it effects the cost they pay.
 
MPG is very relative to how the vehicle is driven and the prevailing road conditions at the time.
Our Kuga is pretty good on fuel with the wife driving. But takes a hit when I drive, because I use the throttle more aggressively.
I managed 42 odd MPG on a recent 255 mile drive to my parents. I did however complete the 255 miles in 4 hours.
20171105_094332.jpg
 

Similar threads