M

Mother

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #1

Still useless barstards :-(

 

N

Neil Brownlee

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #2

Hmmmm....

Elucidate for us..

--
Neffalump

 

M

Mother

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #3

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:26:37 +0000 (UTC), "Neil Brownlee"
<n.brownlee@pccontrolNOSPAMsystems.com> wrote:

>Hmmmm....
>
>Elucidate for us..

I'd rather calm down a bit first - lest my head explode...

 

N

Neil Brownlee

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #4

Ok,

No worries, after sending my V5 to them 3 times to change my engine number
and capacity I have had a new, yet unchanged one sent back, 3 times. I've
given up now.

--
Neffalump

 

A

Alan Brown

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #5

Having a similar problem trying to change address without change of
ownership. They sent it to the address though

Alan

"Neil Brownlee" <n.brownlee@pccontrolNOSPAMsystems.com> wrote in message
news:cc181a$sge$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> Ok,
>
> No worries, after sending my V5 to them 3 times to change my engine number
> and capacity I have had a new, yet unchanged one sent back, 3 times. I've
> given up now.
>
> --
> Neffalump
>
>
>

 

A

ady

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #6

I tried to change the address (spelling) on my driving license about 20
years ago. Twice I sent it back with the details corrected on the reverse
and twice they sent it back with the same spelling error! It's still wrong
now LOL

Ady

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Jul 2, 2004

• #7

On or around Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:53:59 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
@"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:

>Still useless barstards :-(

I had a letter from them telling me that I was no longer the keeper of my
110, following my sending them the V5, duly annotated.

a) they've never done that before, and
b) what a waste of time and effort.

--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
Confidence: Before important work meetings, boost your confidence by
reading a few pages from "The Tibetan Book of the Dead"
from the Little Book of Complete B***ocks by Alistair Beaton.

 

S

Simon Barr

Guest

• Jul 2, 2004

• #8

In article <8hjae057l3em1pu51jaqqe7sud3f85d5na@4ax.com>, Austin Shackles wrote:
> On or around Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:53:59 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
> @"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:
>
>>Still useless barstards :-(
>
> I had a letter from them telling me that I was no longer the keeper of my
> 110, following my sending them the V5, duly annotated.
>
> a) they've never done that before, and
> b) what a waste of time and effort.
>

The're probably notifying you in case it wasn't really you sending the
old V5 off. Most likely some anti fraud type measure to prevent people
getting hold of V5's for illegal purposes.

--
simon at sbarr dot demon dot co dot uk
Simon Barr.
'97 110 300Tdi.

 

S

SteveG

Guest

• Jul 2, 2004

• #9

On 2 Jul 2004 12:10:57 GMT, Simon Barr <me@privacy.net> wrote:

>In article <8hjae057l3em1pu51jaqqe7sud3f85d5na@4ax.com>, Austin Shackles wrote:
>> On or around Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:53:59 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
>> @"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:
>>
>>>Still useless barstards :-(
>>
>> I had a letter from them telling me that I was no longer the keeper of my
>> 110, following my sending them the V5, duly annotated.
>>
>> a) they've never done that before, and
>> b) what a waste of time and effort.
>>
>
>The're probably notifying you in case it wasn't really you sending the
>old V5 off. Most likely some anti fraud type measure to prevent people
>getting hold of V5's for illegal purposes.

It's so that when the person you sold the car too doesn't tax it and
gets nabbed by one of those nice little cameras or he gets a thousand
quids worth of parking tickets you can show the police/courts that the
vehicle was no longer yours.

Regards
Steve G

 

A

Austin Shackles

Guest

• Jul 3, 2004

• #10

On or around Fri, 02 Jul 2004 18:50:25 GMT, SteveG <spam@spam.co.uk>
enlightened us thusly:

>On 2 Jul 2004 12:10:57 GMT, Simon Barr <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <8hjae057l3em1pu51jaqqe7sud3f85d5na@4ax.com>, Austin Shackles wrote:
>>> On or around Thu, 01 Jul 2004 14:53:59 +0100, Mother <"@ {mother}
>>> @"@101fc.net> enlightened us thusly:
>>>
>>>>Still useless barstards :-(
>>>
>>> I had a letter from them telling me that I was no longer the keeper of my
>>> 110, following my sending them the V5, duly annotated.
>>>
>>> a) they've never done that before, and
>>> b) what a waste of time and effort.
>>>
>>
>>The're probably notifying you in case it wasn't really you sending the
>>old V5 off. Most likely some anti fraud type measure to prevent people
>>getting hold of V5's for illegal purposes.
>
>It's so that when the person you sold the car too doesn't tax it and
>gets nabbed by one of those nice little cameras or he gets a thousand
>quids worth of parking tickets you can show the police/courts that the
>vehicle was no longer yours.

could be useful, then. Good job I kept it.

--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"The boys are dreaming wicked or of the bucking ranches of the night and
the jollyrodgered sea." Dylan Thomas (1914 - 1953) Under milk wood

 

N

Neil Brownlee

Guest

• Jul 1, 2004

• #11

Ok,

No worries, after sending my V5 to them 3 times to change my engine number
and capacity I have had a new, yet unchanged one sent back, 3 times. I've
given up now.

--
Neffalump