A
Austin Shackles
Guest
OK, while I'd got the head off and sundry other stuff out of the way, I
thought it'd be an idea to change the timing belt, which according to the
service record has done about 40K miles.
the belt that's come out has been eaten by the famous timing belt pulley
misalignment fault thing to the extent of about 2mm off one side of it; so:
a) is it going to do that repeatably (i.e. if I put a new belt on, will it
just eat 2mm in 40K miles, or will it eat it more rapidly)?
b) is it worth trying to source the necessary mods and fit 'em?
My current thought is that if it's only worn 2mm off in 40K miles, it can't
be far out, and it may not be worth the extra hassle and expense and delay
in getting the parts to modify it. The key point is whether a replacement
belt will suffer significantly more damage. I'm quite happy to change it at
36K mile intervals, which is only going to be about every 3 years for the
mileage the vehicle does, but if the wear rate is apt to be random, then
that's not really safe.
wot d'yer all think?
--
Austin Shackles. www.ddol-las.fsnet.co.uk my opinions are just that
"For millions of years, mankind lived just like the animals. Then
something happened which unleashed the power of our imagination -
we learned to talk." Pink Floyd (1994)