Totally OT -advice on digital camera purchase

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
N

Nikki Cluley

Guest
Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.
--
Nikki

1990 Discovery V8i
1985 Range Rover V8
1975 88" Series III 2.25 petrol
1979 Series III Lightweight 2.25 petrol

 
In article <BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Any recomendations? =A3250-=A3300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


What are you looking for? Point-and-click-I-don't-konw-anythign-about-
cameras, or a proper SLR? You'll get an SLR lookalike for that price.

Compatibility with a Mac shouldn't be a problem, though what version of=20
MacOS are you running?

Ta,
Aled.
 
Hi Nikki,

It's the lens not the camera - rubbish in , rubbish out!

I swear by Nikon - go for the best you can afford.

Cheers

Mark HH


"Nikki Cluley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]...
> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.
> --
> Nikki
>
> 1990 Discovery V8i
> 1985 Range Rover V8
> 1975 88" Series III 2.25 petrol
> 1979 Series III Lightweight 2.25 petrol
>



 
On or around Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:23:54 +0100, Nikki Cluley
<[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:

>Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


well, I've been quite satisfied with my new (secondhand) toy, which is an
Olympus C700UZ. it's a few models behind the leading edge... the same
series has 720, 730, 740 and maybe more now. ah yes, 750, 756, 770.

the UZ is for ultrazoom, they have 10x zoom. bit flighty to hold still on
maximum zoom, though. The later ones have more pixels (mine's a "mere" 2.1
Mpix, but that makes for 1600x1200 pictures) and use XD cards rather then
smnartmedia which mine does.

others have had good results from fuji cameras, and in fact we also have a
fuji finepix 1400 here which is a nice little point-and-shoot style with a
3x zoom.

may I recommend

http://www.dpreview.com/

especially the "cameras" link on the bar on the left - very good for
comparing specs.


actually, the one I really fancied was the Oly 2100UZ, which also has image
stabilisation, but they tend to be a bit more pricey.

 
In article <BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]>, Nikki Cluley wrote:
> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


I've got a Fuji S602zoom and I think it's fantastic, does everything I want.
It uses a 340MB IBM microdrive for storage and as long as you can use USB or
have a card reader on the Mac it'll probably work.

It's been superseded now but I should think that current Fuji models are
similar. You can do point and click or have everything on manual if you
like. 6x optical zoom as well.

For lots of choice take a look at

www.digitaldepot.co.uk


--
simon at sbarr dot demon dot co dot uk
Simon Barr.
'97 110 300Tdi.
 
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:23:54 +0100, Nikki Cluley
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


I would look at

www.dpreview.com

and then buy from www.pixmania.com

I have a fairly old Sony 'big brick' 4MP job, and it is great if a
little slow shutter wise. Battery life is particularly good.

Mandy has a tiny Casio 2MP job, which is great as it is always in her
handbag and ready to go.

The smaller they are, the more likely they are to break IME.

I know very little about Macs, but presume you can get a media card
reader for them, in which case just about any camera will work with
it.

--

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70

My Landies? http://www.seriesii.co.uk
Barcoding? http://www.bartec-systems.com
Tony Luckwill web archive at http://www.luckwill.com
 
On Friday, in article
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Mr.Nice." wrote:

> Twas Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:23:54 +0100 when Nikki Cluley
> <[email protected]> put finger to keyboard producing:
>
> >Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

>
> For that money I'd look at a fuji, maybe S602.
> I personally don't like fuji as they have problems with accurate
> colour reproduction, probably not an issue for most people but
> photography is what I do.
> My personal reccomendation would be to get an olympus C-750 UZ second
> hand, and as big a memory card as you can afford. (128 is a sensible
> size to aim for).
> As long as your Mac OS is a fairly recent one you'll not have any
> compatability issues, macs are very common in the photography world
> and camera manufacturers know this.


It's worth checking on what type of memory cards are being used in new
kit, and the current memory card prices, as some of the cheaper cameras
use rather expensive memory cards. Mine uses Compact Flash, which goes
up to pretty huge sizes, but unless you are dealing with really high-
resolution cameras I wouldn't bother with more than 512MB. You can do a
quick burn to CD-R without having to do any selection.

It's also worth checking what types of card those digital print booths
at Boots can take.

Memory cards, of all types, tend to be expensive on the High Street. Go
for an Internet supplier -- I've been well-satisfied by www.7dayshop.com

If you do invest in more than one card, get a case. I have a nice
aluminium one, about the size of a fag packet. Many of the cards are a
bit small and easy to lose. Small in the camera, or other gadget (check
what PDAs use too) is good. Small in your pocket-fluff is bad.

Memory card choice is a long way from being everything, but if you at
least check what a mobile phone or other gadget might use, you've a
chance of not having to spend on multiple formats.

And having a memory card reader, rather than relying on a cable between
camera and computer, is good. For one thing, it doesn't drain the
camera battery. For another, it may not need any special software on
the computer.





--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"History shows that the Singularity started when Sir Tim Berners-Lee
was bitten by a radioactive spider."
 
In article <[email protected]>, Mr.Nice wrote:
> Twas Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:23:54 +0100 when Nikki Cluley
><[email protected]> put finger to keyboard producing:
>
>>Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

>
> For that money I'd look at a fuji, maybe S602.
> I personally don't like fuji as they have problems with accurate
> colour reproduction, probably not an issue for most people but
> photography is what I do.


Is the 602 considered a good camera then? I know next to nothing about
photography and bought my 602 cos I liked the look and feel, also being
point and shoot as well as manual appealed to me. I though it may make
me learn a bit about photography, and I have a bit, I sometimes use the
manual settings.

What colour problems do Fuji's have? I've noticed reds and oranges aren't
always right, sometimes the're not bright enough, others they almost glow.

On the whole I'm very please with it though.

--
simon at sbarr dot demon dot co dot uk
Simon Barr.
'97 110 300Tdi.
 
Nikki Cluley wrote:
> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


As well as what everyone else says, its worth thinking about the batteries.
Digital cameras eat batteries, get a camera that takes AA batteries, that
way if you are ever out and about and run out of power you can just replace
the batteries rather than trying to find a power outlet and the time to
recharge the cameras own batteries.
And of course get some rechargables. Make sure you read the 'mAh' of the
battery, try and get ones as high as possible, 2000mAh or somewhere around
there.
--
Lightweight 1979
nigelATleginDOTorg
Google first
ask later


 

"Nikki Cluley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]...
> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.


I bought a Fuji S500 last year and I must say i am very pleased with the
results, as simple point and click or as complex as you want it with all
sorts of controls you find on a 35mm.
128Mb memory and away i go. 20x zoom, (10x optical)

Highly recommended

AlunP

 
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 08:59:06 +0100, Austin Shackles
<[email protected]> wrote:

>others have had good results from fuji cameras, and in fact we also have a
>fuji finepix 1400 here which is a nice little point-and-shoot style


All of my pics (4gig or so) on www.101fc.net were taken with Fuji
Finepix [whatever I had at the time] cameras. I'm currently trying to
break a Finepic F402

 

>
> worth noting that optical zoom is a true zoom, digital zoom simply
> crops the image to the centre thus reducing the quality.
> the common rule is never to use the digital zoom, you can get the same
> effect editing later.
>
>
> Regards.
> Mark.(AKA, Mr.Nice.)
> --

I agree, the optical zoom is superb...... excellent lens

AlunP
 
On Friday, in article
<[email protected]>
[email protected] "Mr.Nice." wrote:

> Twas Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:56:13 GMT when "Nigel"
> <[email protected]> put finger to keyboard producing:
>
> >Nikki Cluley wrote:
> >> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

> >
> >As well as what everyone else says, its worth thinking about the batteries.
> >Digital cameras eat batteries, get a camera that takes AA batteries, that
> >way if you are ever out and about and run out of power you can just replace
> >the batteries rather than trying to find a power outlet and the time to
> >recharge the cameras own batteries.
> >And of course get some rechargables. Make sure you read the 'mAh' of the
> >battery, try and get ones as high as possible, 2000mAh or somewhere around
> >there.

>
> That's good advice, I carry 3 sets of 2300mAh, though I've never yet
> run-down one set on a shoot.


Remember that rechargable batteries can deliver more current than an
alkaline. Fresh alkalines are a useful emergency power source, but many
cameras will need more current than slightly discharged alkalines can
supply.

--
David G. Bell -- SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

"History shows that the Singularity started when Sir Tim Berners-Lee
was bitten by a radioactive spider."
 
In message <BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]>, Nikki Cluley
<[email protected]> writes
>Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

Canon - gives you the option of point and click or control the settings
yourself. Also will take additional lenses.
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting
 
in article [email protected], Aled at
[email protected] wrote on 29/10/04 7:09 am:

> In article <BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
>> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

>
> What are you looking for? Point-and-click-I-don't-konw-anythign-about-
> cameras, or a proper SLR? You'll get an SLR lookalike for that price.
>
> Compatibility with a Mac shouldn't be a problem, though what version of
> MacOS are you running?
>
> Ta,
> Aled.


OS 10.3.5
--
Nikki

1990 Discovery V8i
1985 Range Rover V8
1975 88" Series III 2.25 petrol
1979 Series III Lightweight 2.25 petrol

 
in article [email protected], Richard Brookman
at [email protected] wrote on 29/10/04 8:57 am:

> Nikki Cluley <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<BDA7300A.11F98%[email protected]>...
>> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

>
> I think Nikon do a fully waterproof camera.
>
> Rich


Ha Ha
--
Nikki

1990 Discovery V8i
1985 Range Rover V8
1975 88" Series III 2.25 petrol
1979 Series III Lightweight 2.25 petrol

 
in article [email protected], Austin Shackles at
[email protected] wrote on 29/10/04 8:59 am:

> On or around Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:23:54 +0100, Nikki Cluley
> <[email protected]> enlightened us thusly:
>
>> Any recomendations? £250-£300 max and must be compatible with a Mac.

>
> well, I've been quite satisfied with my new (secondhand) toy, which is an
> Olympus C700UZ. it's a few models behind the leading edge... the same
> series has 720, 730, 740 and maybe more now. ah yes, 750, 756, 770.
>
> the UZ is for ultrazoom, they have 10x zoom. bit flighty to hold still on
> maximum zoom, though. The later ones have more pixels (mine's a "mere" 2.1
> Mpix, but that makes for 1600x1200 pictures) and use XD cards rather then
> smnartmedia which mine does.
>
> others have had good results from fuji cameras, and in fact we also have a
> fuji finepix 1400 here which is a nice little point-and-shoot style with a
> 3x zoom.
>
> may I recommend
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/
>
> especially the "cameras" link on the bar on the left - very good for
> comparing specs.
>
>
> actually, the one I really fancied was the Oly 2100UZ, which also has image
> stabilisation, but they tend to be a bit more pricey.
>

Will have a look at link in a bit. Thanks

--
Nikki

1990 Discovery V8i
1985 Range Rover V8
1975 88" Series III 2.25 petrol
1979 Series III Lightweight 2.25 petrol

 
Back
Top